The Trump administration is doing away with a Biden-era rule that created incentives for doctors to develop “anti-racism” plans and use race as a primary factor in medical treatment.

The Department of Health and Human Services reversed the rule last week, consistent with the administration’s broader opposition to left-wing racial ideologies.

Read more on National Review.

On a cold day in Kansas earlier this year, Chloe Cole testified in front of the state Senate Committee on Public Health and Welfare on Senate Bill 63, the “Help Not Harm Act.” It would prohibit healthcare providers from performing “gender-affirming” surgeries or prescribing puberty blockers and hormones for minors. She explained how she was given puberty blockers and testosterone at 13, had a double mastectomy at 15, and now she must wear bandages on her chest every day, among other complications.

“My parents were warned that if not affirmed in my identity and decision to transition, it was likely I would commit suicide,” said Cole, now 21, who was 20 at the time of her testimony. “Medical professionals did not provide my parents with any other option.”

Read more on Washington Examiner.

Jonni Skinner was a “naturally effeminate” gay boy who struggled to be accepted by those around him. In the pursuit of acceptance and understanding, Skinner ended up getting a referral to the gender clinic at the University of Michigan and Mott’s Children’s Hospital. There, Skinner was told he wasn’t gay, but that he was born in the wrong body and put on a path to medically transition to a girl. He was 13 years old at the time.

What followed is a harrowing, heartbreaking story of medical abuse, malpractice, and fraud.

Read more on Townhall.

MADISON – Young adults who received gender-affirming health care as minors could sue doctors for a wide range of injuries deemed to be related to the treatment under legislation considered in a Nov. 5 legislative hearing.

The bill, introduced by Sen. Rob Hutton, R-Brookfield, and Rep. Amanda Nedweski, R-Pleasant Prairie, would create a civil cause of action against a health care provider who performs a gender transition procedure resulting in “any physical, psychological, emotional, or physiological injury.” Lawsuits could be filed until the treated individual reaches age 33.

Read more on the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

What’s happening to our doctors? Researchers at an organisation called Do No Harm recently found that American healthcare professionals were more than two times likelier to be anti-Semitic than their share of the workforce, and that physicians are nearly 26 times overrepresented among individuals identified as having publicly shared anti-Semitic content. This is a worrying tendency which seems common across the West. A few weeks ago a UK-based doctor was accused of denying the Holocaust and celebrating the Hamas attacks of 2023; in August a doctor in Liverpool who praised Adolf Hitler was let back into work; a med-school student in Quebec was revealed in October to be the moderator of a Discord channel hosting anti-Semitic slurs; earlier this year two Australian nurses were suspended for threatening Jewish patients.

Read more on The Spectator.

As parents fight school districts in the courts to disclose when their children express gender identity at odds with sex, allied with a transgender child psychologist who has repeatedly urged judges to clue in parents, they face a lesser known roadblock to transparency about their children’s health: electronic health record systems that lock them out.

A report by medical advocacy group Do No Harm said “it appears that healthcare systems are using sexually transmitted infections, mental health concerns, and drug and alcohol exceptions” in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act’s privacy regulation “to remove parental access to their child’s entire medical record – well beyond the limits of the law.”

Read more on Just the News.

The Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW) in Milwaukee required medical students to attend a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) workshop in October, according to documents obtained by the nonprofit Do No Harm.

The “Race Matters Workshop,” embedded within MCW’s “The Good Doctor” course on professionalism and ethics, featured learning objectives requiring students to “[d]emonstrate knowledge of inherent biases and how they affect the way we interact with patients and advocate for them.”

Read more on Campus Reform.

The conservative physician advocacy group Do No Harm recently flagged the UNM School of Medicine in a report as one of the five worst U.S. medical schools for still lowering academic standards to boost the number of racial minorities training as doctors.

Ian Kingsbury, director of Do No Harm’s Center for Accountability in Medicine, applauded Mr. Jakiche’s lawsuit against the school.

Read more on The Washington Times.

The National Institutes of Health has slashed funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion-focused projects by 80%, saving taxpayers $168.7 million in the first six months of the Trump administration, according to an exclusive Do No Harm study shared with Newsmax.

Dr. Kurt Miceli, medical director at Do No Harm hailed the cuts as a “turning point” that prioritizes “merit and scholarship over ideology,” redirecting resources toward high-impact biomedical research.

Read more on Newsmax.

The legal doctrine of government speech, which inhibits individual First Amendment rights, got a massive expansion from the Pacific to the Rockies thanks to a federal appeals court that upheld ideological requirements for ongoing professional licensing rules, according to lawyers for a California doctor challenging her state’s rules.

The Pacific Legal Foundation told Just the News it will file a petition for rehearing by the full 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals following a three-judge panel’s ruling Friday that deemed the Golden State’s mandatory “implicit bias” training in accredited continuing medical education, of which doctors must complete 50 hours every two years, government speech.

Read more on Just the News.

The “Black Scholars Matter” program at California State University Northridge violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 according to a new federal complaint shared with The College Fix.

Civil rights activist Mark Perry filed a complaint against the program, which he called a “racially exclusionary program that illegally excludes and discriminates against non-Black students.”

Read more on The College Fix.

Following its workshop on the deceptive practices in “gender-affirming care” for minors, the Federal Trade Commission launched a public inquiry in order to learn from consumers how such care has harmed and deceived them personally.

Do No Harm Senior Fellow Dr. Jared Ross told The Center Square that “the Federal Trade Commission’s request for public comment is a great step forward in exposing ideologically motivated physicians and ending the heinous practice of so-called pediatric gender medicine.”

Read more on The Center Square.

(The Center Square) – One plaintiff called the decision “willfully naïve” on Tuesday after a federal appeals court upheld the dismissal of a lawsuit last week challenging Washington state laws that allow minors to access mental health and gender-affirming care without parental consent. 

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit affirmed the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington’s dismissal. The ruling puts the lawsuit, filed by two parental rights groups and five sets of parents, to bed – at least for now. 

Read more on The Center Square.

Medical and healthcare education accreditors are abandoning diversity, equity, and inclusion requirements for schools, a Do No Harm report shows, with the organization’s medical director saying accreditors must still be held accountable “to ensure lasting reform.”

Do No Harm is a group that represents “physicians, nurses, medical students, patients, and policymakers focused on keeping identity politics out of medical education, research, and clinical practice,” according to its website.

Do No Harm’s medical director, Dr. Kurt Miceli, told The Center Square that “it’s encouraging to see the progress that has been made since the President’s executive order just three months ago,” referencing Trump’s April order to reform accreditation.

Read more on the Center Square.

new study which found racial minorities living in poor areas actually have a lower risk of mental health problems relating to pregnancy compared to their similarly situated white counterparts shows racism is a “complex” topic, according to the authors.

This paper, published in Social Science and Medicine, hypothesized that residing in “structurally deprived neighborhoods” would be associated with a higher risk of hospital-reported “perinatal mental disorders” for minority populations, while no such association would exist for white mothers due to systemic racism.

Read more on the College Fix.

Several medical school accreditors appear to be abandoning their commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) as the Trump administration proves it means business.

Of the 11 major medical associations and accreditors identified in a new report released Thursday by Do No Harm, eight have modified or entirely suspended their DEI requirements for member institutions. The Trump administration has been attempting to root out the discriminatory practices for months, reminding schools that they are bound by civil rights law and cannot have policies that prefer certain groups of people over others.

“We are pleased that many of the accreditors responsible for injecting identity politics into medical education are backing off their DEI requirements,” Stanley Goldfarb, chairman of Do No Harm, said in a statement. “While these early results are encouraging, there is still much work to be done to rid our institutions entirely of the rot of racial politics. Removing DEI from accreditation standards is necessary, but to fully reform medical education, schools must also abandon DEI in favor of merit everywhere it is found.”

Read more on the Daily Caller.