If you are not happy with the results below please do another search
Despite the widespread backlash against “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” (DEI) measures in healthcare, true believers continue to introduce ideology into medical practice. No other takeaway is possible when one examines a course currently available in the “Anti-Racism Coalition” educational series at the George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences (GW SMHS).
The Southern Poverty Law Center faces charges of wire fraud, bank fraud, and conspiracy for sending $3 million to members of white supremacist and neo-Nazi groups. This indictment led me to update the book I wrote in 2020, “Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center.” At the end of the update, I give a list of concrete ways you can take action against the SPLC.
In 2020, a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) made waves in reporting that black newborns were more likely to survive when under the care of black physicians. In a report published by Do No Harm, we speculated that the correlation was spurious. Analysis from economists George Borjas and Robert VerBruggen confirmed our suspicions, and author correspondence retrieved through public-records request suggests that the study conclusion may not have been an oversight but an effort to preserve preferred narratives.
A new report details how local healthcare providers may exploit insurance rules to secure payment for child sex-change procedures.
Stanford School of Medicine quietly removed diversity, equity, and inclusion language from its website after the U.S. Department of Justice launched an investigation into alleged racial discrimination in its admissions process.
Two universities are attempting to dodge public-records requests by asserting that course syllabi are “copyrighted and protected intellectual property” or “trade secrets.” Such responses proceed from a misapplication of state law and risk undermining the principles of transparency and public oversight of public institutions.
Today, Do No Harm published an open letter to the Council on Social Work Education (CSWE), an accrediting body for social work education programs, requesting the organization remove DEI mandates from its accreditation standards. The letter identifies numerous examples of DEI-related concepts that CSWE forces programs to inject into their curricula. Do No Harm urges […]
Meet Dr. Ky Dorsey, Utah psychiatrist and Do No Harm member.
Dr. Dorsey is no stranger to treating patients who experience gender dysphoria.
As a psychiatry resident at the Johns Hopkins Hospital in 2015, he had the opportunity to train in the Sexual Behavior Consultation Unit (now Sex and Gender Clinic), gaining knowledge and training across the spectrum of psycho-sexual disorders including gender dysphoria. Even as a novice psychiatrist, he had misgivings surrounding so-called “gender-affirming care.”
After medical watchdog Do No Harm filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services over what it called Kaiser Permanente’s racially discriminatory “Center for Black Health and Wellness,” the healthcare organization updated the center with a disclaimer that all races are welcome. Do No Harm says it’s not enough.
Two major healthcare systems have altered their websites to remove indications of racial discrimination following complaints by Do No Harm filed with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights (HHS-OCR).
A recent report by medical advocacy group Do No Harm revealed that Texas Tech University’s internal medicine residency program is staffed almost entirely by residents who attended medical school outside the U.S., raising concerns about discrimination.
The LCME’s revised standards recognize that medical education must prioritize the knowledge and skills only physicians—not social workers or policy advocates—are trained to deliver. Its pivot back toward self-directed study, critical appraisal of evidence, and professional learning aligns with medicine’s mission.
Healthcare providers may be able to misrepresent transgender treatments for minors as routine care that is unrelated to gender-affirming treatments, a new report from medical watchdog Do No Harm revealed.
A paper published last month by medical watchdog group Do No Harm warns state officials and health insurance providers that “Healthcare Providers May Skirt Coding Rules to Get Paid for Child Sex Changes,” as the title puts it.
The report from medical watchdog group Do No Harm shows how doctors are able to use medical codes claiming things like generic endocrine care as stand-ins for so-called “gender-affirming” interventions for children.
The New England Journal of Medicine’s Perspective “Antiracism Pedagogy in Medical Education” (published April 4, 2026) illustrates how parts of academic medicine have wandered away from anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology toward an antiracism framework that remains nebulous at best and divisive at worst.
Minority representation in med schools—which had dipped in California and even ebbed nationally after California’s landmark Prop 209 (banning affirmative action)—roared back to peak-AA levels and beyond.
The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) is changing the language it uses to refer to its preferred admissions strategies, potentially offering a fig leaf to medical schools intent on engaging in ideologically motivated or racial admissions policies.