If you are not happy with the results below please do another search
Healthcare providers may be able to misrepresent transgender treatments for minors as routine care that is unrelated to gender-affirming treatments, a new report from medical watchdog Do No Harm revealed.
A paper published last month by medical watchdog group Do No Harm warns state officials and health insurance providers that “Healthcare Providers May Skirt Coding Rules to Get Paid for Child Sex Changes,” as the title puts it.
The report from medical watchdog group Do No Harm shows how doctors are able to use medical codes claiming things like generic endocrine care as stand-ins for so-called “gender-affirming” interventions for children.
The New England Journal of Medicine’s Perspective “Antiracism Pedagogy in Medical Education” (published April 4, 2026) illustrates how parts of academic medicine have wandered away from anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology toward an antiracism framework that remains nebulous at best and divisive at worst.
Minority representation in med schools—which had dipped in California and even ebbed nationally after California’s landmark Prop 209 (banning affirmative action)—roared back to peak-AA levels and beyond.
The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) is changing the language it uses to refer to its preferred admissions strategies, potentially offering a fig leaf to medical schools intent on engaging in ideologically motivated or racial admissions policies.
Today, medical watchdog Do No Harm released a new report exposing how healthcare providers may be able to fraudulently skirt medical coding rules to receive insurance reimbursement for so-called “gender-affirming care.”
The rise of the child transgender industry over the past decade has relied, in no small part, on the financial incentives for physicians and hospitals to perform sex-denying medical interventions. These procedures offer a potentially lucrative revenue source.
Following a federal investigation announcement, an elite medical school is quietly altering its online materials.
Most Americans don’t realize this, but their health has been at risk for years. Divisive and discriminatory ideology has crept into health education, under the guise of so-called “diversity, equity, and inclusion.” This politicized worldview has become foundational not only at medical schools, but also at the nursing schools that train my profession. The sudden turn toward indoctrination means that future nurses are spending less time actually studying the essentials of nursing and patient care.
Dr. Azadeh Khatibi and the medical watchdog organization Do No Harm filed a petition on Tuesday asking the Supreme Court to take up a case challenging continuing medical education requirements that mandate instructors teach doctors about “implicit bias,” which is the claim that a person can unconsciously discriminate against another. Khatibi argues that the requirements, which were signed into law by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, force medical professionals to push politically charged ideas.
Today, Do No Harm and Dr. Azadeh Khatibi petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) to protect free speech in medical training by striking down California’s mandate that Continuing Medical Education (CME) courses contain implicit bias curriculum for physicians. The Pacific Legal Foundation represents both parties in this action.
The American Medical Association Foundation website no longer includes listings for race-based scholarships after a medical watchdog suggested the foundation should lose its tax-exempt status for racial discrimination.
In practice, of course, DEI often manifests as racially discriminatory hiring, admissions, and recruiting policies; it is definitionally anti-merit and degrades the quality of health services; it treats people as members of specific identity groups rather than as individuals and organizes clinical care accordingly; and it views healthcare institutions as vehicles for social and political change, usually at the expense of clinical excellence.
On April 20, 2026, Do No Harm submitted an amicus brief to the North Carolina Court of Appeals supporting detransitioner Prisha Mosley in her lawsuit against those healthcare professionals who she alleges subjected her to sex-rejecting interventions as a minor. Mosley filed the lawsuit after receiving cross-sex hormones and having her breasts removed, alleging her […]
This week, Do No Harm submitted an amicus brief to the North Carolina Court of Appeals in support of a lawsuit brought by detransitioner Prisha Mosley to hold accountable those healthcare professionals who subjected Mosley to sex-rejecting interventions as a minor.
Two Midwestern hospital systems are facing civil rights complaints alleging they unlawfully restrict scholarship opportunities based on race, escalating a broader push against diversity-focused programs in medical institutions by the Trump administration.
On April 21, 2026, Do No Harm filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) against Valley Health System for operating a discriminatory student healthcare scholarship program exclusively available to racial minorities. Valley Health “proud[ly]” offers the “Minority Healthcare Scholarship” to its patients for pursuing healthcare […]